SureFire M6LT-B Guardian 1200 lumen searchlight - Mini Review and discussion

880arm

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,752
Location
Wildlands of Western Kentucky
At SHOT Show SureFire announced upcoming changes to several of their high-output lights and it looks like the M6LT Guardian is the first to receive a makeover. I was fortunate to receive a review sample from SureFire which I have been running through the paces for the past couple of weeks. :twothumbs

Overview

If you aren't familiar with the M6LT, it's a single output mode searchlight that measures just over 8" long and weighs a little over 1 pound when loaded with 6 123A lithium primary batteries. It is not intended to be a "jack of all trades" and does not include any of the gee whiz features we're accustomed to seeing on today's "tactical" lights. This latest version bumps its rated output up to 1200 lumens, a 33% increase over the previous 900 lumen model.

DSCF1433.jpg

Designated as the M6LT-B, the new Guardian is essentially the same as the previous M6LT with the only visible differences being some slight changes in the laser engraving (the serial number on the body is gone as with many of their other recent lights) and a change in the head designation from KX9T-A to KX9T-D. The 2.5" TIR optic appears identical to the "open window" design on my older M6LT.

DSCF1407.jpg

The window is coated which makes a clear shot of the LED difficult (for me at least) but the "secret" to the upgrade is clearly a new emitter mounted on a silver colored chip, which would appear to be a Cree XM-L2.

DSCF1394.jpg

The 1.75" body still features the prominent grooves and knurled ridges as its predecessors, going all the way back to the incandescent M6. It's a classic design that has endured for over a decade and is one of my favorites. The design provides plenty of grip and is surprisingly comfortable to hold.

DSCF1381.jpg

Hanging out at the rear of the light is the large tailcap and protruding tactical switch. Operation is identical to several smaller SureFire lights with momentary mode activated with a press of the switch and constant-on available by tightening the tailcap. The included welded steel lanyard ring is removable if desired.

DSCF1361.jpg

Everything about the M6LT is overbuilt, even the removable battery magazine which holds 6 123A lithium primary batteries. Batteries are held very securely between the heavy steel clips and contacts.

DSCF1429.jpg

When installed into the light, the battery magazine is supported by springs at both ends. The inside of the tailcap has an impressive looking solid aluminum slug that completes the electrical circuit when the switch is activated.

DSCF1422.jpg

Performance

The M6LT-B produces a strong beam with a clearly defined center hotspot and a larger surrounding secondary spot. From there the output tapers into a fairly broad but much less intense spill beam which allows for some peripheral vision of nearby objects. The main spot is able to provide every effective illumination beyond 250 yards and even the somewhat less intense secondary spot is good for more than 150. The beam is very different from the original SureFire 2.5" TIR lenses which provided a tight center spot with virtually no secondary spot.

The beam has an overall cool tint with center portion of the beam having a creamy white appearance with very little of the green or yellow sometimes present with the XM-L2. The spill beam is noticeably cool.

The following beamshots were taken at a distance of 100 yards to the building and show the UB3T Invictus (800 lumen with the "old" TIR lens), the M6LT-B Guardian (1200 lumens) and its predecessor the M6LT-A (900 lumens and also with the "open window" TIR lens).

Side-by-side beamshot comparisons with several other lights can be viewed in my full M6LT Guardian Review.

20140718113709-33f013d6-me.jpg


20140718113704-177a2882-me.jpg


20140718113703-c943bdd9-me.jpg

These beamshots illustrate the much broader beam of the "open window" optic and also how similar the output the outputs of the M6LT-A and M6LT-B really are. The M6LT-B is more powerful but it is more obvious on paper than in real life.

In addition to 123A lithium primary batteries, the M6LT may also be powered by six LFP123 rechargeable cells such as those from K2 Energy. Runtime testing was conducted with both types of batteries with no external cooling provided.


SureFire-M6LT-B-Runtime.jpg

With both types of batteries, the M6LT starts out with a huge burst of light followed by a rapid decline over the first minute of operation. The rechargeable batteries sustained this lower level of output for 50+ minutes before beginning a rapid decline as they were depleted. The Battery Station 123A primary batteries lasted for just shy of 2 hours before beginning a long tapering decline.

It's interesting to note that the M6LT merely becomes warm during extended operation. The large cooling fins do a nice job of taking heat away from the LED and electronics while the 6 battery configuration keeps the current draw reasonable and reduces the amount of heating from the batteries.

Conclusions

It's good to see the M6LT receive an upgrade to a newer emitter with the corresponding bump in output. The incremental increase in output isn't anything that will immediately stand out to owners of the previous M6LT but it's nice to have nonetheless.

A light like this certainly isn't for everyone but when it comes down to simple operation, rugged construction, and throwing a bunch of light downrange for a prolonged period of time, it's just the ticket.

Please feel free to check out the full M6LT Guardian Review at FlashlightGuide.com for more rambling, photos, beamshots, and stuff! :wave:
 

270winchester

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 9, 2004
Messages
3,983
Location
down the road from Pleasure Point.
In the beamshots that you showed comparing the M6LT-B with lights like Malkoff HoundDog, the hotspot of the Malkoff's seem to be all on the ground and not much reach the target. Is it because the beam diverge enough before the target that it looks like the Malkoff's were pointed down more than the Surefires, or was there a difference in mounting angle?

Great review by the way.
 

880arm

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,752
Location
Wildlands of Western Kentucky
In the beamshots that you showed comparing the M6LT-B with lights like Malkoff HoundDog, the hotspot of the Malkoff's seem to be all on the ground and not much reach the target. Is it because the beam diverge enough before the target that it looks like the Malkoff's were pointed down more than the Surefires, or was there a difference in mounting angle?

Great review by the way.

Thank you.

The mounting angle was the same for all lights, or at least as close as possible. All lights were positioned with their hot spot on the building at 100 yards.

What you're seeing in the foreground is just part of the spill beam from those lights. The grass and weeds are higher toward the middle of the field than where the lights were positioned which also affects how the beams look.
 

tab665

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
1,212
Location
north carolina
just wanted to note that for the last couple years ive ran my M6LT with a 2 x 18650 adapter. works great in that setup, although I don't have any kind of way to measure the output and regulation.
 

scout24

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
8,869
Location
Penn's Woods
I would love to see side by side beamshots with the Hound Dog. I looked at your full review and didn't see them if they are there. Output and runtime graphs would be great, too. I know, buy both and do them my darned self! :) I own the Hound Dog, but that new M6LT looks awesome... Thanks for the review!
 

Redhat703

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Messages
396
just wanted to note that for the last couple years ive ran my M6LT with a 2 x 18650 adapter. works great in that setup, although I don't have any kind of way to measure the output and regulation.

I run my M6LT with 2xAW IMR 26500 and a Fivemega M6 tailcap :twothumbs
 

880arm

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,752
Location
Wildlands of Western Kentucky
just wanted to note that for the last couple years ive ran my M6LT with a 2 x 18650 adapter. works great in that setup, although I don't have any kind of way to measure the output and regulation.

The M6LT runs great with 2x18650. With AW 3400mAh 18650s, output and regulation are identical to the CR123s for the first 90+ minutes and not a lot different after two hours.

I would love to see side by side beamshots with the Hound Dog. . . Output and runtime graphs would be great, too.

The Malkoff Hound Dog (both cool white and neutral versions) are included in the beamshot comparisons in the review. You can compare the different lights by clicking through the images with the arrow buttons in the bottom right-corner of the beamshots.

20140728163822-c8fcebd6.jpg

A runtime chart for the Hound Dog is included in its review.

I hope I understood what you were asking for. Let me know if that's not it and I will try something different! :thumbsup:
 

scout24

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
8,869
Location
Penn's Woods
880arm- Above and beyond! Thank you much... you'd think after almost six years here I would have known how to scroll through the beamshots in your reviews... :ohgeez::shakehead
 

880arm

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,752
Location
Wildlands of Western Kentucky
Good deal! I need to do something to make that more obvious. :thinking:

Lots of folks have thought it just shows off/on for the light and miss out on what the arrows do.
 

fivemega

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
5,554
Location
California
I run my M6LT with 2xAW IMR 26500 and a Fivemega M6 tailcap :twothumbs
The M6LT runs great with 2x18650. With AW 3400mAh 18650s, output and regulation are identical to the CR123s for the first 90+ minutes and not a lot different after two hours.

Has anyone try 6xIMR16340 rechargeable in MB20 or 3x17670 (11.1 Volt) with $urefire M6LT ?
 

tab665

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
1,212
Location
north carolina
Has anyone try 6xIMR16340 rechargeable in MB20 or 3x17670 (11.1 Volt) with $urefire M6LT ?
ive havent heard of anyone trying any combination of 3 x l-ion in series in one of these. i dont think anyone wants to run the risk of the classic instaflash. i still use my 2x18650 carrier on mine. For the life of me i cant remember if when surefire made the stand-alone LED turboheads if it was compatible or not with the M4 (12 volts). if so then 3x l-ion should be fine.
 

Latest posts

Top