Sometimes the obvious is not always that obvious.
Mind you, I've never worked with a mill at all, so my only introduction to one is through my reading. As you know, my lathe has some limited milling capabilities, as the headstock can be moved vertically.
The tapered slots that I did on the 18650 battery tube, and posted pics of in post 130, are an example.
However, as I proceeded to correct my major mistake of the battery tube, i.e., uneven lengths for the slots, I noticed that the surface quality of the slots was sporadically poor. It looked as though one side of the groove was being gauged, while the other half looked fine.
I decided to do some testing, to see if the different RPMs and depths of cut would make a difference. Here's a test piece:
As you can see, in the middle of the photo is the problem that I was encountering, while just to the left of that is a very shallow cut done at high RPMs. I thought I had figured it out, but then I took a close look at the first completed head, which had been polished a bit:
When looking at those grooves, it was rather obvious that the problem was not gauging within the grooves, but smearing of the chips onto one side of the groove. They just optically appeared to be gauges.
Finally, I had one more thing to check on a test piece: I wanted to test the groove's appearance when the depth of cut was uniform along the length of the cut; so I eliminated the taper and just did some normal grooves:
As you look at that photo, the end closest to the camera was the end of the piece that was held in a collet in the dividing head. My normal method for making the grooves was to start the milling of the groove close to the collet and to move the piece toward me. However, as you can see in the photo above, there was one groove that was cut in the opposite direction, i.e., the piece was moved into the end mill and toward the collet and dividing head.
Bingo!
I had been improperly moving the piece in relation to the ball nose end mill; the part should move toward the mill, which is rotating CCW in the spindle, or toward the operator.
So back to the second iteration, but this time with the proper feed of the part to the end mill:
At this stage, I'm very pleased with the outcome--the grooves are much, much smoother than my previous attempts, and the lengths of the grooves are now identical in length.
Lessons learned: Read the books more carefully. And, there's nothing like hands-on experimenting.