stephenk
Enlightened
I've seen some interesting behaviour in my fairly new Liitokala Lii-500 with older (non-Eneloop) LSD NiMH cells.
With new and high quality AA and AAA NiMHs, the charger reliably terminates at 1.48V, and HKJ's review points to a voltage termination rather than -delta V.
With some older AA and AAA NiMHs, I see a mixture of behaviour:
1) Cells never reach 1.48V (some don't even go above around 1.42V) and keep on charging (and increasing in heat) far beyond their rated capacity. I should note that these cells also fail to terminate on my Panasonic BQ-CC17 charger.
2) Cells terminate charge at a lower voltage than expected (e.g. I had one cell terminate at 1.43V). This surprised me as I though a voltage termination was used.
Has anyone else seen this behaviour with NiMHs? If the Lii-500s use voltage termination, how come a cell can terminate at lower than usual voltages?
With new and high quality AA and AAA NiMHs, the charger reliably terminates at 1.48V, and HKJ's review points to a voltage termination rather than -delta V.
With some older AA and AAA NiMHs, I see a mixture of behaviour:
1) Cells never reach 1.48V (some don't even go above around 1.42V) and keep on charging (and increasing in heat) far beyond their rated capacity. I should note that these cells also fail to terminate on my Panasonic BQ-CC17 charger.
2) Cells terminate charge at a lower voltage than expected (e.g. I had one cell terminate at 1.43V). This surprised me as I though a voltage termination was used.
Has anyone else seen this behaviour with NiMHs? If the Lii-500s use voltage termination, how come a cell can terminate at lower than usual voltages?