Along those same lines; my internship with Argonne National Labs 25 yrs ago, permits the US Dept of Energy to control discussion on this forum through my administrative powers here.
I don't want to turn this into a conspiracy thread, but I think they can make a vaccine a lot faster than 16 months.
Do you know how often forum staff read posts such as, "I don't want this to (XXXX), but (xxxx).", and then have to clean up the resulting mess w/ subsequent member replies ?
It is a very transparent method to initiate a conversation towards a supposedly-undesirable direction, but to preface that by denying the blame for doing so ahead of time.
It's a pretty weak position to take, and one that forum staff have been seeing since the dawn of online forums.
If you think that XXXX
does not equal xxxx, don't suggest it - staff will have to clean up the mess.
If you
do think that XXXX equals xxxx, at least accept responsibility for trolling the conversation.
Suggestion; if you don't want to have a conversation, don't start that same conversation that you are disavowing in advance.
The CPF Underground is the forum for such things; feel free to explore that direction there if you truly have an interest.