Not very fair comparisons if you ask me. Lots of crappy lights lights added to the testing line up to boost the stats on better known brands. Even the lights themselves are designed to meet different specs. He mainly tested brightness and runtimes on high mode only. There aren't too many people who run their lights on high mode only. To say an Olight gets second place is just wrong.
Eh, I kind of like that he's NOT a [tested product] nerd, in that he tests stuff more like how normal people use things.
Also, I don't think he intentionally chooses "bad" brands, but he buys what's popular on Scamazon, because that's what the normies do, haha.
As much as I dislike Olight, I think it's a fair test, and I'm not surprised it did well.
I find both Olight and Fenix to be
acceptable lights that do what is advertised, but I just find them to be a poor value.
For their price, you start getting into Malkoff territory, and there's a lot of cheaper stuff that performs like they do. BUT, for a normal person who just wants a balance, and will pay the premium, they're fine.
Again, I wouldn't buy anything from Olight or Fenix, but I can understand why a normal person would.
Without exception, the everyone I know runs their flashlights on high mode only. They REALLY think I'm a nerd because I run things on low. This is why a basic 2xAA or 2xAAA Maglite is also the most popular (and ACTUALLY used) light I gift people. They just want something simple that turns on, and is bright enough.