benben_stone
Enlightened
First post in this thread for 2012!!! :twothumbs
E-mail sent for one x Ti 2xAA McClickie Pak
Thanks Don. :candle:
E-mail sent for one x Ti 2xAA McClickie Pak
Thanks Don. :candle:
You can become a Supporting Member.
The Ti 2xAA pak was designed specifically with this in mind, yes, compatible and intended for such.Is the Ti 2xAA McClickie pak compatible with a Haiku XML head and/or a Mule Hi CRI Nichia 119 head?
Quick Question.
Are these paks the same "swollen" design as the 2x123 paks?
I had the lanyard hole added in subsequent batches to the first run and the 1xAA pak also has the lanyard hole.Don. I noted that the 2AA Pak comes in 2 variants. One of which has got a lanyard hole directly the opposite side where the screws hold the clip.
Is this a recent offering / alteration of this pak?
Noted with thanks Don.I had the lanyard hole added in subsequent batches to the first run and the 1xAA pak also has the lanyard hole.
strictly out of curiosity, and I do hope to pick one of these 2xAA paks up one day, how much skinnier are these AA bodies than the 123 paks?
I realize the diameter of CR123s is wider by design versus AAs though
The large diameter at the tail is .990" on the 1x123 and .850" on the 2xAA The larger diameters at the "waist" of the 1x123 is .815" and .750" on the 2xAA.
thank you sir! so for all intents and purposes they'll feel the same when being gripped, huh?
I actually find the AA profile better as far as grip goes, but it likely depends on your hand size and preferences.
eala
+1 I really the AA pak also. The slight added length and the larger ribs make it more comfortable in my opinion.