You can become a Supporting Member.
Im interested, but unsure. I tried the netkidz kits and did not really like them because of the extended switch travel and over all feel, they are good switches otherwise. How does the feel of the Mcclicky compare to the Surefire Z59?
Can I ask why you went with Brass over Alunminum?
Mac
The upside is the McClicky has a very short, light travel. The downside is that the McClicky has a very short, light travel.
I've had a McClicky turn on and latch on while the light was in a jacket pocket. Twice. IMO, it is a very sensitive switch. It takes very little travel and very little pressure to engage momentary-on. Although the required travel is a somewhat more for constant-on, the force required to click the switch is still quite light.
The switch in the first version of FiveMega's 1x26500, 2x26500, and 3x26500 hosts has a comparably short travel and light touch for momentary-on. However, my perception is that the travel and force for constant-on are both greater than for the McClicky.
My SureFire Z48 and Z49 both have much longer travel and much heavier force needed to engage constant-on. I don't mind the longer travel, but the heavier force is a little too much IMO, especially since the SF tailcap has that shroud. It would be nice, IMO, if the switch force could be intermediate between the McClicky and the Z48/Z49.
Can I ask why you went with Brass over Alunminum?
Im interested, but unsure. I tried the netkidz kits and did not really like them because of the extended switch travel and over all feel, they are good switches otherwise.
You are correct Sgt., the McClicky does have a shorter travel.
The upside is the McClicky has a very short, light travel. The downside is that the McClicky has a very short, light travel.
I'll take one kit for my C2 twisty. Assuming it's somewhat reasonable to "DIY".
Will the Clicky Kits work with a Surefire M3 Tailcap too?