adirondackdestroyer said:I don't think there have been, but I really wish one of the pros would do one (Roy,Chevro,Doug). If the results came out really positive I couldn't imagine any light being much better than this.
HAIII *cough*
adirondackdestroyer said:I don't think there have been, but I really wish one of the pros would do one (Roy,Chevro,Doug). If the results came out really positive I couldn't imagine any light being much better than this.
adirondackdestroyer said:I got mine in the other day and it flickers when I first turn it on and maybe when it's being run (I don't know because I haven't used it for a long enough time). Is this normal or should I return mine for a different one?
Well, this is good news. It means that the FT-01 body is wide enough inside to hold a 168A cell from Wolf Eyes or Pila. 3.7V xenon lamp lovers, we now have a $30 glass-lensed body to host AW's new 2.2A, 100-lumen, 3.7V xenon lamp.VF1Jskull1 said:The body is bored a bit larger than the battery diameter so there is some radial play, hence rattle possible... my solution was cut a index card and wrap the batteries to fill the gap to prevent the radial movement.
DragonFlame said:Could someone please tell me what's the diameter of the lens, please? I was thinking of replacing the stock lens with a diffusing one in case I decide to get the FT-01.
DragonFlame said:Thanks!
There seem to be problems with the FT-01. From what CPF-ers have been saying, I gather that it is not yet completly reliable. Seems that there are sometimes problems with the switches and using the lights with 18650 batts.
I guess I'll wait a little bit longer and see whether the issues are solved