ALWZWFO
Newly Enlightened
Just got my BC40. Running with Redilast 3100's, no fitment or operating issues. This puts out very useful light on low setting, can't wait to take it camping!
That shooting bundle is a great idea, I have one of these on one of my rifles with a homemade red filter, great for hunting varmints (coyote) at night. Ill be replacing it with the BC40 with the smooth reflector later this week, throw seems much better to my eyes. Selfbuilt, should the Smooth reflector look that much brighter than the OP reflectored BC40? Great Review as always, Thank You for postingThank you for an excellent review, I'm new on the forum but had seen this during my search for a suitable lamp to mount to my riflescope for night time shooting and it certainly influenced my decision.
I decided on the JETbeam BC40 'shooting bundle' which comes with mounts/remote switch etc. and ordered it direct from the (UK) website. It should be with me today so once I've set up and tested it I'll add my thoughts on how it performs.
Probably not much, but it may seem that way at a distance.Ill be replacing it with the BC40 with the smooth reflector later this week, throw seems much better to my eyes. Selfbuilt, should the Smooth reflector look that much brighter than the OP reflectored BC40? Great Review as always, Thank You for posting
I like neutral tints, btw, how is the throw on the SMO?
Compared to a Lumintop TD-15 R5, the beam profile of my BC40W SMO is similar but with seemingly longer throw and brighter spill. I imagine the SMO reflector won't improve throw much compared to the OP version for reasons Selfbuilt has already explained. However, the hotspot is very well-defined on my SMO model. I hope to put up some beamshots for comparison soon.
where did you purchase your bc40w from? as i posted above i bought one from light junction around the same time as you but it cam with the OP reflector
I didn't include all the variants in the table, but the original Catapult V1 and the first editions of the V2 both had SST-50 emitters. The V2 was subsequently upgraded to XM-L, where I did indeed measure 46K lux @1m. My V3 (which is also XM-L), measured just over 40K lux @1m. Overall output is equivalent between my V2 XM-L and V3 XM-L, so I presume it is just a minor difference in focusing between the samples. I would expect the "typical" XM-L-based Catapult to be in the low 40K region for lux @1m.noticed one thing in the table, the catapult v2 doesn't have a sst-50, it has a xm-l which was tested to 46K lux in selfbuilts test.