fyrstormer
Banned
1) How would you achieve variable brightness without tint-shift, if not by using PWM? I agree that VHF PWM is preferable to anything humans can perceive, but as far as I know, PWM is the only way to get variable brightness without tint-shift.Always something, isn't it? PWM is the sign of poor programming/design. I would have gotten this if the PWM wasn't noticeable. Also a shame they don't have a CRI version.
2) All light sources have a CRI rating. You mean Hi-CRI.
1666 lumens in a package so small is probably doable with current technology (though it would require a high-quality LiPo battery that would raise the cost significantly), but such a small package can't collimate light very effectively, so the vast majority of those 1666 lumens would be emitted as spill. If you're looking for a "wall of light", then that's fine; if you want more throw you pretty much have to get a larger light. TIR optics can collimate light more effectively than reflectors can, but not enough to make a really throwy beam in such a tiny package. I've been on a Surefire kick for the past couple months and I've been surprised at just how effective ~100 lumens can be at a distance when they're focused tightly. You'd think I'd have learned that lesson at some point over the past 10 years, but...I have no explanation for how I missed it.After 3 days of usage it is my favorite light. Considering I'm an old fart that grew up on 2 D cell flashlights that produced 8 to 12 lumens in a form factor larger than my Big Bruiser, something this small and convenient cranking out 150 lumens for 90 minutes is perfect for me. As soon as a manufacture builds a light in the same size as the Mycro 400 and uses a single XHP35 HD for a 10 second burst of 1666 lumens, that would be my new favorite. So anyone in the industry, IMHO a keychain light with 150 lumens with 90 minute duration, 50 lumens for 3 hours, and 15 lumens for 7.5 hours and 1666 lumens for many 10 second bursts would get my vote.
Last edited: