I value any knowledge which is result of my own experience but of course buying readily available item is cheaper.Would this be any better or worse than using that acrylic diffusion lens from flashlightlens.com mentioned in this thread?
I value any knowledge which is result of my own experience but of course buying readily available item is cheaper.Would this be any better or worse than using that acrylic diffusion lens from flashlightlens.com mentioned in this thread?
The site used to say 94% light transmission.
Whatever the number is it is at least as good as the stock Maglite lens. At 300 feet I did not see any reduction in output with my 3 cell ML25 using a TL3 bulb and acrylite lens versus using the stock lens.
Did you ever order these reflectors and try them?Re: New Mag C-cell incandescent twisties: M25IT
I just scoured the kaidomain site and found a metal reflector that looks promising mjg.
7mm opening.
Now the Mag is about 39mm wide where the kaidomain is 35.
The Mag is roughly 25 mm tall and so is the kaidomain. But the push point of the Mag is about 22mm away from the top of the reflector. That seems to mean a 3mm protrusion of the reflector.
Repeat photo to show my point.
A lens is about 1.5mm thick. So doubling a lens and fastening the bezel about a mm shy of complete still covers the o-ring.
At some point I'll put together an order from them and await the 'slow-boat-from-China' to deliver that and whatever else I've ordered.
Maybe somebody else will have tried it by then.
It's $2.85.
They also have a 36mm dedicated "C2" reflector, but no dimensions for the bulb opening are given.
It's a skill matching bulbs to the reflectors. SureFire got it right but Mag always had losses from the big gap between the reflectors and bulb. Probably to make room for the beam adjustment system but as you say output is reduced. I've given up trying to find one of these in the UK but all focus type systems for the Mag - even the custom reflectors - have this lumens loss at optimal focus. It's annoying but a price to pay for the focus feature. Personally speaking the focus is not so useful as wide just means a big black hole in the beam. Fixed focus is the best I feel.so I took the light out and it sucks. It's a 7.2v 1.2A bulb. So should be roughly 200 lumens or so. I'm seeing about half that. A 6 cell magnum star bulb is much brighter. I noticed when I came back inside that the filament is at the same level as the reflector opening when I'm at optimum focus. Which makes sense why it's so dim. Guess I'm losing over 50% of the light out the back. Is it because it's a reflector made for LEDs and the focal point just isn't right?
No but in this case it's half as much output as a stock 6 cell bulb in a kaidomain mag C OP reflector. But this has a 1.2A bulb and was brighter before with the stock reflector.It's a skill matching bulbs to the reflectors. SureFire got it right but Mag always had losses from the big gap between the reflectors and bulb. Probably to make room for the beam adjustment system but as you say output is reduced. I've given up trying to find one of these in the UK but all focus type systems for the Mag - even the custom reflectors - have this lumens loss at optimal focus. It's annoying but a price to pay for the focus feature. Personally speaking the focus is not so useful as wide just means a big black hole in the beam. Fixed focus is the best I feel.