holeymoley
Newly Enlightened
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2007
- Messages
- 87
Power drain, water behind the lens, off-center dies, different versions. You guys just scared me into buying a Zebralight (my second choice). C'mon Nitecore, get your act together.
Others in this thread have gotten 14500's to work with the D11.2. What cells are you using?
But the light gets pretty hot on max and the low is much higher than with Ni-MH cells.
I really wish we could get that ability in the D11.
Interesting. So the circuit in the D and EX are different. They aren't the same "broad voltage" driver. Good to know the EX handles 3+ volts better, but I really wish we could get that ability in the D11.
Mine fit 14500's fine. But pull way too high current, they draw around 2A fully charged, that will kill the led in not too long. Both of mine had incredibly low low modes too, well under 0.5 lumen. One was so low you could hardly tell it was on looking at the emitter unless it was dark. The lights always draw 50ma from the circuit even in standby for 30 seconds before going into 'inactivity' mode so however low the lowest mode is they will never be incredibly efficient. For example if the light is putting out 0.1 lumens and the XP-G needs 5ma for that then it will still draw 55ma, the efficiency difference between 1 lumen and 0.1 lumen in negligible, so I would be glad of a slightly higher lowest setting.
Actually, on one of mine I ran 14500 in it and burnt out the boost driver. It now won't run Ni-mh cells at all, and seems to run direct drive with a 14500, but it retains all the modes and the dimming function, it also draws 1.3A from a 4.2v cell now at max charge instad of 2A, so is safe to use with 14500's. I have one for each cell chamistry now, though the 14500 only one is more of a novelty (in my old D10 housing and modded with a 90+CRI XP-G).
how is the current production, is they have fix the leak and other problem?
All I can say is: for me the D11.2 does at least the same as the "good old" D10, and my D11.2 sample is working flawlessy (including waterproofness). I just carried it on a 2-week-holiday and I am very satisfied. So if you like the D11.2 features, just take it.
In the last photo on the site for the D11-2 is a trit slot , in the one up from that is not a trit slot , Optional?
Paul.
Paul - From what I see on lightjunction, the tritium slot is optional on the D11.2. Does anyone know whether the slot is offered on the EX11.2? The D.11 has significantly lower high-end output.