Translation of Post #44 from TLF: http://www.taschenlampen-forum.de/armytek/43369-armytek-predator-v3-xp-l-hi-5.html
"Various batteries I have not tried it yet in the Predator, it therefore can not say with certainty whether or how this affects the brightness. But I do not think it makes a difference. In general, I think that here in the forum the effect of IMR batteries is considerably overestimated in such Taschenlämplis. Anyway, as long as a lamp is not just 7A draws from a battery. The Predator is unlikely to pull through 3A which is also protected "normal" brand batteries before no problems. However, I have here once documented the difference in compensation between the Pro and non-Pro version of the Predator V3 Limited Edition with XP-L Hi and FIG. Measured were the first 2 hours of run time. Every 5 minutes was taken a photo, and then combined into this little animation. Left is the Predator Pro, and on the right the Predator non-Pro. In both cases, LG was INR18650 MJ1 used with 3500mAh. Not because I particularly great find these batteries, but because I had just ready no other at the moment. After these 2 hours the battery had made the Predator Pro idle nor 2.75V. The battery from the Non-Pro had after these 2 more hours 3.25V.The Pro version manages to provide a shorter term, question without being brighter at any point than the non-Pro version. I would say, because in a Pro ineffizienterer driver has been installed (Boost Driver?) Who brings no advantages, but only drawbacks at least with good batteries. Regards, Markus
I wonder if this is also true for the Dobermann Pro.
"Various batteries I have not tried it yet in the Predator, it therefore can not say with certainty whether or how this affects the brightness. But I do not think it makes a difference. In general, I think that here in the forum the effect of IMR batteries is considerably overestimated in such Taschenlämplis. Anyway, as long as a lamp is not just 7A draws from a battery. The Predator is unlikely to pull through 3A which is also protected "normal" brand batteries before no problems. However, I have here once documented the difference in compensation between the Pro and non-Pro version of the Predator V3 Limited Edition with XP-L Hi and FIG. Measured were the first 2 hours of run time. Every 5 minutes was taken a photo, and then combined into this little animation. Left is the Predator Pro, and on the right the Predator non-Pro. In both cases, LG was INR18650 MJ1 used with 3500mAh. Not because I particularly great find these batteries, but because I had just ready no other at the moment. After these 2 hours the battery had made the Predator Pro idle nor 2.75V. The battery from the Non-Pro had after these 2 more hours 3.25V.The Pro version manages to provide a shorter term, question without being brighter at any point than the non-Pro version. I would say, because in a Pro ineffizienterer driver has been installed (Boost Driver?) Who brings no advantages, but only drawbacks at least with good batteries. Regards, Markus
I wonder if this is also true for the Dobermann Pro.
Last edited: