Ahh you can run .40 in that g32. I believe just with a barrel change. 357 sig is just a necked down .40sw?
A barrel change would do the trick, but I would probably also use 40 SW magazines due to the follower being mildly different - though I've heard that the 357 follower works just fine. As for the shell casing, the 40 was the basis for the design of the 357, but it's my understanding that the 357 case is just a bit longer and has slightly thicker walls. I'm pretty sure that a fresh untrimmed 40 shell could be necked down to produce a 357, but I'm not a reloader, and it's not in my nature to risk it if I were. BTW, I don't have anything against the 40. It's just one of those rounds that's fun to pick on. I used to carry a G27 and a G23 in 40, but the 9mm is faster with follow up shots. The 357 SIG used to get plenty of abuse, but it's such a rare caliber these days that no one seems to mock it anymore. It was used by the Secret Service due to its vehicle penetration capability, but I think even they have gone back to 9mm the last I heard.Ahh you can run .40 in that g32. I believe just with a barrel change. 357 sig is just a necked down .40sw?
"I don't need to outrun the bear. I need to outrun YOU!"
I've had almost as many firearms as I currently have flashlights. I used to do some basic gunsmithing as a hobby, refinished guns, hunted, was a CCW, and a mod on a gun forum, and did a bunch of gun crimes.Certainly nothing wrong with firearms threads. But having frequented a number of firearms forums, it often comes as no surprise that the depth of expertise on flashlights there is lacking. The same tendency is frequently demonstrated here; aside from the OP, there are relatively few here I would pay much attention to honestly.
A barrel change would do the trick, but I would probably also use 40 SW magazines due to the follower being mildly different - though I've heard that the 357 follower works just fine.
Ejector is the same on both calibers due to the rim diameters being the same. It's when converting to a 9mm that the ejector (among other things) needs to be changed.Three differences: barrel, ejector, magazine follower.
The .40 feeds at a much steeper angle. The 357 Sig still works with the .40 follower because of the bottleneck feeding.
Ejector is the same on both calibers due to the rim diameters being the same. It's when converting to a 9mm that the ejector (among other things) needs to be changed.
My mistake. I've been shooting only Gen 3s for the last 20 years and had not even considered the newer models. The Gen 3s are identical.In the Gen 4:
357 Sig ejector is # 30499
.40 S&W ejector is # 28926
The ejectors are shaped very differently. It's very noticeable even at a glance. The ejection patterns are also different.
Honestly, you're better off sticking with the Gen. 3s.My mistake. I've been shooting only Gen 3s for the last 20 years and had not even considered the newer models. The Gen 3s are identical.
Upgrade to a newer mag unless you live in a state that needs prebans as the old ones aren't built as well. They swell when full and the floorplates aren't on so sturdy as later mags.I still have an original Gen 1 G17. Actually finally gave it to my son. Serial number put it in first year they were imported to the US. No idea if it special as in collectable but it's special to us.
The big thing is we can see the massive changes made from Gen 1 through side by side comparisons.
Honestly, you're better off sticking with the Gen. 3s.
They are less picky on ammo if in 9x19.why?