Also, just FYI, almost all interior lights are electronically controlled (that is how they get them to stay on a few seconds after the door is closed), so reading voltage off that may not be accurate.
Regulation in this arena might be more costly than a simple cap fed transistor that operates as a slow shutdown switch. Not surprisingly, with the power rail connected to the battery if the rectifier that bridges the alternator with the battery has no or poor filteration loops you'll get alot of wonderful readings that at times meaningless. Many times I itch to hook up my car to an oscillioscope
aside from dimming, there is also a shunt somewhere in the circuit that disconnects all loads during engine start, possibly with express intention to protect them from engine start related power spikes.
Along that line of thinking, there is a reason that a lot of switching power supply IC's are being designed to operate from voltages up to 80v or so, and that's for automotive applications. They do make it easier to reduce power dissipation and still operate over the 9v to 18v that might exist on the battery bus, as well as some of the long transient pulses.
I wish I knew of a small protection module that non-EE's could just add to their design. Until then, I'd use my earlier suggestion, and try to use a big TVS (transorb, or transient voltage suppression diode). Might want to include a fuse too, just in case. The parts don't cost all that much, and are good insurance for $20 (or more) of LEDs and current regulator circuitry.
Steve K.
Switching power supplies also comes in "HV" varieties. Since the output does not deal directly with input its just a matter of internal component sizing.
Aside from TVS's would MOVs and varisters work in this situation for protection? Harnessing the same method household surge protectors have used for years and step the claming factor by a notch
I have retrofitted LED Parking Lamps and interior lights that simply use dropping resistors - years later they are still working.
LEDs may continue to emit light years after severe phosphor decay around its die due to thermal overload, so judging from output may be an inaccurate method to measure lamp longevity. Resistors are actually a pretty good way to maintain current regulation, provided that the resistor type can maintain its tolerance over high temperatures and the LEDs [after burn-in] do not exhibit a dramatic decrease in foward voltage over time. Resistors are the most cost effective method of current regulation when the total current across a load is around 100ma or less. Even at 100ma, 3-5mm piranha leds typically are overdriven by at least 40%. For this reason many LED retrofit products parallel them in clusters. This is not a bad concept, what is bad is the cheap LEDs lack a heatsink, with the emitter thermally isolated in an epoxy dome. Even if they are driven at spec, output will diminish over time father than SMT leds.
Aren't at least some (if not all) car's circuits already regulated? It seems to me that the radio for example, must have a fairly stable voltage to work properly. And what about the GPS and all those electronic gadgets? There must be some kind of power conditioning in there... I'm just wondering.
Good point, I suspect for cars that have built in GPS, TVs, actual computers using hard drives and internet ready operate these devices over a seperate loop than what the rest of the car runs on.
It would be nice if cars offered a nice clean 12v bus for solid state devices to operate from, but I haven't heard of this happening.
12V no, but it shouldn't be very hard....