Re: Why are there not more mass-produced dedomed leds?
LEDs produced without domes should be called undomed, not dedomed. The difference is that an undomed LED will still have a protective coating over the die, applied by the manufacturer, it's just flat instead of spherical (or approximately so). A dedomed LED may have no protection, and so may degrade (much?) more quickly.
The reason LEDs are domed is that the shape of the dome allows more of the light to be passed through the dome/air interface than is possible with a flat surface. With an undomed LED, more of the light is reflected internally and thus (at least partly) lost. So the same die will have higher output with a dome than without. Since domed LEDs work as well as undomed in most lighting fixtures, and lighting accounts for the vast majority of sales, that's what the big guys go after.
If you think that throwy flashlights represent a market that LED makers, including Luminus, even NOTICE much less care about, then you have no grasp of the numbers involved. A few years ago, I was involved with a lighting project for military use. The LED we were using for prototypes was made obsolete by a major manufacturer. We offered to buy a million LEDs (yes, really a million, not an exaggeration), and they didn't even bother to reply to our requests. Do you think the throwy flashlight market has anything like that kind of clout?
Throwy flashlight makers aren't even begging for table scraps, they are digging in dumpsters. They take what they can get and use their ingenuity to create wonders. We marvel. LED makers don't.