Vapcell 1600mAh 18350 battery

Candle Power Forums

Help Support Candle Power:

Torchy the battery boy

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 13, 2018
Messages
33
City & State/Province
Glasgow
Vapcell are claiming their F16 is the highest capacity 18350 battery on the market, So I thought I should check it out.
Actual capacity tested at 1601mAh, so no argument on that score and as yet, I haven't come across higher capacity 18350.
DSCF0012.JPG
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-03-21 at 18.38.06_DxO.jpg
    Screenshot 2024-03-21 at 18.38.06_DxO.jpg
    362.7 KB
Are those for sale just batteries I mean, I’d like to try them in my thrunites if they aren’t too expensive, Tks
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I know the Vapcell multi-bay charger is excellent. (A bit overly complicated, but excellent.) Wouldn't be surprised if their batteries are excellent too.
 
I've got a handful of the 1100 Vapcell 18350s (M11s, I think). I have been real pleased w/ the performance.

Not the biggest fan of buying batteries from AE, but might grab a few of these to try.
 
Got the vapcell f16 yesterday and overnight the test result was 1525 mah capacity. It being brand new I'm going run it a few days in my flashlight and then retest, will see how it does then I'll retest capacity again……….well I ran it down and charged it twice so test this time was 1575 mah, hopefully it’ll reach stated 1600 mah after a few more cycles??
 
Last edited:
When u tested had u ran any cycles or just straight to the testing like I did? In the past after a few charge/discharges I’ve had batteries to increase capacity just a little, that’s why I’m asking
 
I know the Vapcell multi-bay charger is excellent

I've been reviewing a bunch of charger info lately, and you've reminded me to ask this:

This review is several years old, but I'm wondering whether or not this referenced 'issue' has since been understood / resolved / corrected, or if it still exists? I haven't found an answer yet. Anyone happen to know? "Half" is a pretty big error;-) (These quotes don't seem to be working correctly, but at least they're linking to the right thread.)

The internal resistance values are only about half of actual resistance, but they are fairly consistent.
I found one error: The internal resistance calculation is wrong
 
Back
Top