What gives MichiganMan? I don't defend the actions of Clinton and I have NEVER blamed Bush for passing the DMCA, even though I *do* blame him for not making a greater effort of getting rid of the piece of trash now that he has the chance.
I think Clinton had the morals of an alley cat, was bribed off by the corporate powers that be almost as much as Bush is and he supported the homosexual agenda which is completely anathema to my beliefs as a Christian. What is there to defend? In fact, I don't remember *ever* defending a single action of Clinton since I've been posting on this message board, although I could be mistaken.
There you guys go again thinking that if I'm opposed to one faction of our governmental mafia that I must automatically be a supporter of the other, because as we all know, there are only 2 political parties in this country in most peoples' minds. I've said it before and I will say it again, both democrats and republicans are nothing more than the very willing and corrupt puppets of the will of whatever corporations/special interest groups that happen to be funding/bribing their current campaign and they do not have the interest of "we the people" at heart to any degree more than what is necessary to appease us into not revolting against the current political system.
I've said this many many times in the past, but I've apparently still not made myself clear so I find myself repeating it again here, in a thread that this has nothing to do with, so I refuse to comment on it further here. If you wish to discuss whom I favor or disfavor politically it is a subject best suited for a topic more appropriate to the subject, as I'm sure that Sasha will agree, just as soon as she reads this...