Which color temperature would you say is ideal for indoor fixed lighting (assuming a fixed high CRI)?
It depends on the application.
I think it is better to use lower color temperatures in smaller rooms, and higher color temperatures in wide open spaces. And typically people prefer higher color temperatures if they are very active and moving around, while lower color temperatures if they want to feel relaxed.
It also depends very much on the person. While most people tend to prefer higher color temperatures, it might be safer to go with a lower color temperature because the people who prefer being under lower color temperature light often really do not like higher color temperatures.
I like the color of 4200-4300K, if I could pick my ideal. But at the same time, I do not think I would want to spend all day under this high of a color temperature, not more than an hour. I like the color, but it is just a little too much to be at comfort in. 3000K may be very yellowish, but I would also feel more at ease if I had to be under it all day. 3200K is a brighter white, but still comfortable, if you have ever seen the halogen spotlights in art galleries. Yes, I think I would choose 3200K if I had to work sitting at a desk all day. If I was constantly moving around, I think I would prefer a somewhat higher color temperature.
I used to use 4500k halogens in my work area, but grew tired of it.
I know what you mean. Higher color temperatures are great, but I would quickly become tired of it. It's more of an "exciting" color of light.
Just my subjective opinion, but when it comes to LED lighting, higher color temperatures tend to be a harsher on the eyes, whereas when it comes to most fluorescents, the lower color temperature ones give off a hideous quality of light. So whether I would prefer higher or lower color temperatures also depends somewhat on
what type of light source it is.
One more thing to point out; I think there is an interesting pattern manifesting itself in the poll. The greatest number respondents preferred 3000K, followed by progressively by higher color temperatures. If we look at the median preference, the color temperature at which the most equal number of respondents think is too high as the ones who think it is too low, according to the poll it is 3500K.
Of course, 2700K is a little extreme, which is why the votes suddenly went down so much going from 3000 to 2700K. But still more people voted for 2700K than 5000K, which tells you 5000K is also too extreme.
It would have been interesting to see what the results of the poll if 4500K would have been an option.
I am currently looking at Cree LMH light modules (max 95CRI 3000K, 3000lm typical or 90CRI with 4000K) for my general lighting.
Sorry to change the topic, but what is really interesting about the Cree LMH 95CRI 3000K module is that they are using a
separate 470nm blue diode emitter to try to increase CRI and gain a slight edge in efficiency. Cree's TrueWhite fixtures already use a ~625nm red emitter and a light mixing chamber, so it really was not a difficult thing to do to design in a separate blue emitter also.