Something interesting I came accross, the TK70 on high mode (930 lumens) puts out more light than the TK41 on turbo (800 lumens), and uses less current (TK70: 1,930 mah; TK41: 2,234 mah) while doing so. Look at the graphs posted by HKJ here:
http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb...-TK70-with-measurements-and-outdoor-beamshots
http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb...-TK41-with-measurements-and-outdoor-beamshots
I guess that because even though the XML can be driven twice as hard as the XPG, the higher it is being driven past the 50% mark, the less efficient it becomes. So the TK70 driving 3 XMLs at 643.3 mah (1,930 mah from the driver / 3 LEDs) is more efficient than the TK41 driving 1 XML at 2,234 mah, while providing more light. And the TK70 can be run on 3 batteries and the head does not get hot at all running on high mode while the head of the TK41 does get hot running on turbo. And the TK70 will last twice as long as the TK41 on high mode too.
http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb...-TK70-with-measurements-and-outdoor-beamshots
http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb...-TK41-with-measurements-and-outdoor-beamshots
I guess that because even though the XML can be driven twice as hard as the XPG, the higher it is being driven past the 50% mark, the less efficient it becomes. So the TK70 driving 3 XMLs at 643.3 mah (1,930 mah from the driver / 3 LEDs) is more efficient than the TK41 driving 1 XML at 2,234 mah, while providing more light. And the TK70 can be run on 3 batteries and the head does not get hot at all running on high mode while the head of the TK41 does get hot running on turbo. And the TK70 will last twice as long as the TK41 on high mode too.