fyrstormer
Banned
Well yes, that's based on the same structural integrity that makes them more crash-worthy too.
If one thinks about it you see more cylinders in the market than squares in all sorts of products like beverages, canned food, etc and the reason for this is two fold in that you don't have to try and align machinery to deal with squares and also deal with corners of them in production plus devices that use them if they were all squares making flashlights to use square cells would get more expensive as you probably couldn't turn them on a lathe easily. If you think about it you don't hardly see any square batteries in many chemistries out there in the single cell variety only batteries that have several cells in them are square these days (like 9v, and 6v lantern batteries) and even these have round cell inside of them. I would like to see prismatic cells cheaper than cylindrical ones and see a common size/shape of them such that people will start making products to use them across the board as the prismatic cells are way too many sizes and shapes and I think even times the ones that are supposed to be the same size/shape..... aren't exactly. It may be possible that a breakthrough in batteries comes with one that doesn't have to be concerned about the chemicals wanting to leak in use and also when used up and/or aging a lot and if this breakthrough happens then we could even see flexible "bag" type batteries that you can make fit into a similar volume/size holding container.Well yes, that's based on the same structural integrity that makes them more crash-worthy too.
Like somebody said above, power tools are the new laptops for cylindrical cells, IMO.
It used to be draws drills, saws and lights that used battery packs, but now we have blowers, weed whackers, hedgers and even lawn mowers.
None of the tree-hugger hippies want gas any longer and 100 yard extension cords are too much work for the fatties, to roll up.
Chris
The environmental impact is the same as a gas car... because the hidden cost is you still have to charge it and use electricity and thus either coal or nuclear or something. It's just a hidden cost, plus the cost of recycling the battery.
Exactly. Ratio of a circle area to a touching square area is a constant value (π/4) no matter the size they are. Now we know who was kicking butts at school instead of studying
There is another issue: generated heat is a function of volume, but dissipated heat is a function of surface area. That is the larger the battery the more it is prone to overheating. More of that, we have no idea about the ability of Li-Ion layers to transfer heat in lateral direction (from layer to layer). So, theoretically, a large battery may be relatively cold outside, but melting in its core.
If this is true then you could replace 7 layers of 18650s with 6 layers of 21700 batteries and be about the same height.Seems it's not going to be 20700 cells after all:
http://fortune.com/2016/07/27/tesla-bigger-battery-gigafactory/
The king is dead, long live the 21-70. :bow:
http://electrek.co/2016/07/28/tesla...and-tidbits-this-is-the-coolest-factory-ever/
Excerpt:
"...When it was my turn, I asked the status of the "20700" battery that has been reported to be going into Model 3…….
- They actually changed the size to 21mm diameter and a 70mm height. They also got rid of the trailing '0' so the name of the battery that will be going into the Model 3 is the '21-70′
- JB Straubel says Tesla developed this battery this size by starting without preconceived notions. They then optimized for efficiency, size and output. The 18650 standard was called an accident of history though it had served Tesla and others well. Tesla says it predicts that this new 21-70 battery size will become a new standard.
- The half centimeter height increase for the car packs would be offset with more efficient battery packaging which will make the packs actually the same thickness or less than current packs and obviously with a higher energy density….."
The ~10% increase to the 18650 size is not unique to Tesla, e.g. last year Samsung SDI announced a 4750mAh 21700 cell (vs. Telsa 20700) targeting the e-bike market, see below
Tesla CTO J.B. Straubel said:"We've spent a lot of time on this actually. It's kind of interesting. There are a bunch of trade offs. There are some things that get better when you make the cell size bigger, and some things that get worse. 18-650 was sort of an accident of history. That was what was standardized for early products. So we revisited all of those trade offs and came to this size (21-70), which is quite a bit bigger. If you have them next to each other, the actual volume of materials inside is substantially more. And overall it's about cost optimization."
According from the latest press conference because of Tesla/Panasonics grand opening of the Gigafactory today, they are going to use 21700 cells instead of 20700 cells like they have already said.
I don't hope we will be seeing two new standards, both 20700 and 21700. Maybe it's just a matter of how they round off the numbers and they are all around 21.5 mm in diameter. Or maybe 20 mm is just the diameter without plastic shrink tube and 21 mm is the diameter with plastic shrink tube.
The 20700B looks interesting, for flashlight use:
rated capacity: 4000mAh
typical capacity: 4250mAh
discharge: 8A
http://akkuplus.de/Panasonic-NCR-20700B-36-Volt-4250mAh-Li-Ion-LiNiCoALO2