Wave of Ti PD Mules **SOLD**

[jch79]

FWIW, my Mule has a beefy bottom...

 

[Codeman]

Now that you have your Mizer Mule, bernie, care to add standard, beefy, and lean to the FAQ?

 

[Fringe]

Codeman,
Thanks for the link and yes, the wide bottom moniker is missleading, we should crisen it wide bezel.

 

[Rudi]

The only problem is that it, just like all the other Ti-Heads, won't be able to turn on high mode on the III-T body. That would have been a killer combo !!

bernie

Why won't it turn on high mode on the III-T body?
I asked Don whether my III-T was a suitable host for the Mule head and he said yes without any qualifications.

 

[McGizmo]

Rudi,
If I made that statement then I made it in error; either I wasn't thinking or misread the question. Sorry! The original Ti twisty paks have the "contact shoulder" just a tiny bit too deep for the contact ring to make contact with. You will find the head bottoms out on the pack prior to getting into "high". A modification of adding some solder lumps on the contact ring or a male/ female shim that went between the converter and the head to elevate the converter and contact ring could be employed as a fix.

On one hand we now have some folks interested in the C pak because of is extended length over the PD pak and on the other hand some like the slightly shorter and simple twisty pak for the Mule. :shrug:

 

[Codeman]

Codeman,
Thanks for the link and yes, the wide bottom moniker is missleading, we should crisen it wide bezel.

Huh?:thinking:

 

[Groundhog66]

My Mule head would not work on my C pak from my XR19-C.

Tim

 

[Sable]

I think the Mule would be too small for my already-dainty hands...but I am extraordinarily interested in the Ultraflood light distribution - I think there might be something to the 2x123 or C-pack Mules...

 

[McGizmo]

My Mule head would not work on my C pak from my XR19-C.

Tim

:thinking: :shrug: Humm.... I don't know what is going on here. I cleverly don't even have a single C pak so I can't even check this out!

 

[bmstrong]

>>The original Ti twisty paks

*cough*cough* Don should really really think about doing another run of these. *cough*cough*

I know someone who might be in for one.

And you Mule guys might like to purchase a Ti Twisty pack for added flavor!

 

[Kiessling]

Mine works perfectly on the C-Pack. No problemo.

Cody ... :nana: ... gimme a pic of the three variations with your name for them and we shall do so

Mizer is plenty bright indoors. Plenty bright. This light is truly a different experience. One has to see to understand ... :9

bernie

 

[Codeman]

:thinking: :shrug: Humm.... I don't know what is going on here. I cleverly don't even have a single C pak so I can't even check this out!

I just swapped heads between my Mule and my XR19-C. The Mule works fine on both levels using my 1x123 C pack, and the XR19 head works fine on the Mule PD pack. That doesn't help Groundhog66, but it rules out any design issues, tolerance stacks notwithstanding.

 

[Rudi]

Thanks for the clarification Don.

Rudi,
If I made that statement then I made it in error; either I wasn't thinking or misread the question. Sorry! The original Ti twisty paks have the "contact shoulder" just a tiny bit too deep for the contact ring to make contact with. You will find the head bottoms out on the pack prior to getting into "high". A modification of adding some solder lumps on the contact ring or a male/ female shim that went between the converter and the head to elevate the converter and contact ring could be employed as a fix.

On one hand we now have some folks interested in the C pak because of is extended length over the PD pak and on the other hand some like the slightly shorter and simple twisty pak for the Mule. :shrug:

 

[arewethereyetdad]

awtyd,

You can't just drop a bomb like that and not explain to us newbies. Please, what is a wide tail? :thinking:

Thanks, Ken

Here's another shot I just took:

Original Ti PD on the left (my main EDC), Ti PD-S in the middle, Ti PD Mule on the right. Note the chamfer angle on PD-S and the Mule. It's less angle, hence more "beef" along the edge. That's what I meant by a "wide tail."

 

[KenAnderson]

Here's another shot I just took:

Original Ti PD on the left (my main EDC), Ti PD-S in the middle, Ti PD Mule on the right. Note the chamfer angle on PD-S and the Mule. It's less angle, hence more "beef" along the edge. That's what I meant by a "wide tail."

Thanks arewethereyetdad,

Good to see the differences. I believe my Mule would match yours pretty close.

Ken

 

[Groundhog66]

:thinking: :shrug: Humm.... I don't know what is going on here. I cleverly don't even have a single C pak so I can't even check this out!

It works, but something weird happened. When I turned it on, it just blinked and went right off again. I tried it again and got NOTHING

Thought I fried the head, that's not good. Changed the battery and it worked, not sure why the battery would just blow up like that???

 

[PoliceScannerMan]

Here's another shot I just took:

Original Ti PD on the left (my main EDC), Ti PD-S in the middle, Ti PD Mule on the right. Note the chamfer angle on PD-S and the Mule. It's less angle, hence more "beef" along the edge. That's what I meant by a "wide tail."

I was on the phone today with AWTYD, we came up with a name for the "wide tail" mules. Donkeys. :tinfoil:

 

[griff]

HEE HAA, HEE HAA

 

[AndyTiedye]

How long did this wave actually last, from the initial sale post
until the last successful buyer sent his email?

Will there be any more waves or was this it?

 

[kenster]

Hi guys,
The first wave is now all gone and spoken for. There will be at least one more wave of these but I don't know when yet and I will be very curious as to what those of you who caught one, think of it!?! :thinking:

Thanks and sorry for those of you who missed it this time.

AndyTiedye, Don`s answer to your question of there being more Mules and it appears to be a YES! :twothumbs

Best of luck to you catching the next wave!

Ken