SCEMan
Flashlight Enthusiast
And there you have it.
All the threat-to-self-ers are here to tell you that this isn't that big a deal, that the numbers can be smoothed over, because this isn't going to affect me. And the threat-to-group-ers are telling you this is more important than it seems, sharing the data, because this might affect you.
I don't recall myself or anyone else stating it isn't going to affect "me" and I certainly fall in the high risk segment. My perspective is simply to do everything I can to protect my family and any others I can assist; if that makes me a "threat-to-selfer", so be it. But if you're implying your designation somehow correlates to my not "sharing the data" or following social distancing, etc., you need to be mindful of labeling and tacitly shaming people you've never met or even know. Sharing negative hypothetical scenarios that do not translate into beneficial & actionable behavior does nothing but further depress people already heavily stressed. During this national (& global) emergency we need a unified effort with everyone pulling together for the best outcome.
I just took a drive through Claremont and observed numerous young adults in close contact, milling together on the sidewalk. But it didn't occur to me to label them as a group. I simply saw people exhibiting dangerous behavior.