You're grinding the wrong axe here, they will not go down in price. Have you priced hand-assembled and/or made items in other USA industries? Look at selvege denim. PNW boots such as Nick's or White's. Do these companies also owe the consumer a huge price drop, even if employees can no longer earn a living?
A $200 flashlight is a luxury item. HDS does not owe us a huge price drop. Henry has worked and built a great product which has the demand to justify the price. At the end of the day, we vote with our wallets.
The Surefire comment in fact a good comparison. Price for what you get with R&D costs recouped is valid, as well as the large amount of product they build. I will not engage you further. You're not getting a Rotary for $150. None of us are, unfortunately.
[As an aside to the poor faith "I will not engage you further..."
Please don't take the ball so the rest of us can still play...
Why come to a forum, leave a post, and then say you're not interested in a conversation?
So, anyway, for the others looking to have a conversation...you know...the reason you come to a forum...I'll gladly keep talking with them, even if we're just ruminating ideas.]
This is not how markets work.
If something ceases to be a good value proposition, no one buys it.
Prices only increase so long as people will pay. Plenty of things have come down in price, long term, especially electronics. The HDS rotary is not brand new IP hitting the market, so it's harder to justify R&D costs (e.g. when Surefire made a new reflector head for their turbo lights).
I mean, consumers don't OWE companies purchases. You're looking at this entirely backwards. Companies need to compete in the market.
And, I'll wager you're not from the gun world. $200 for a safety related item isn't a luxury purchase. If you NEED a light to not accidentally shoot the wrong person, $200 for a life-or-death item isn't that bad. You just NEED something that WILL work. Most people aren't going to risk a life on a $20 Chinese consumer electronic. People want a high quality, reliable product they can depend on. They understand that will cost more than simply a "mostly reliable" Chinese product, and people are willing to pay that premium.
Most people would agree that if you have a firearm for self-defense, you NEED an illumination device. Most people aren't going to recommend getting the cheapest gun you can. You want whatever is the most reliable gun you can get for the best price. Same with lights for self-defense. There is a floor for the "my life could depend on this working" tools, and people accept that. That doesn't mean they're willing to pay "whatever it takes."
That's not even to mention people who need lights professionally. That's like telling an auto tech that a quality ratchet is a "luxury item" because it's $200, when you can get one for $10 at Harbor Freight; it's completely missing the context and purpose. Heck, do enough wrenching at home, and a $200 ratchet is more of a necessity than luxury (as the cheaper ones break more often).
That's the market HDS entered into, with a product for those exact people, with such needs, and their pricing, performance, and overall featureset is making them a poor proposition for that market in 2024. They're becoming a light that is more expensive than a handgun...with 300 lumens...and a UI that isn't the best thing for a high stress environment.
Meanwhile, for half the price, Surefire is offering a range of US made products, while Malkoff and Elzetta sell lights that I could throw through a window - all with a UI that's perfect for a panicked, high stress situation.
If they want to become a boutique brand for tech bros or EDC fashion people, that's their prerogative. I wish them luck, and I hope they succeed. I think their product is very cool, and I hope it sticks around. Maybe that's their only market niche moving foward...because who else is going to pay for the US made light entry price, and pay all that extra money for a nice UI that's not great in a serious situation? Certainly not professionals. And, the firearms community is likely going to have a hard time recommending such an expensive option for a handheld light. That WAS their bread and butter community these last two decades.
And finally, no one is saying we want $150 Rotaries. I clearly said $400 is a fair price if I could get a 4000K AA rotary. No one here is complaining that Rotaries charge a premium price. I think most of us agree they're worth a premium price. We're arguing as to WHERE EXACTLY that point is. If they come out with some new battery compartments and drivers, I think $400 is perfectly fair. We're saying that over $400 for essentially the same light that's been on the market...a decade?...that's a poor value. It's a nuanced argument, but not too complicated.
Taking the attitude that Henry can just do whatever he wants, and we will all gladly smile and clap is not helpful to HDS. Many of us here are the exact people that comprise the HDS market, and when your market starts telling you things are going in the wrong direction, that's important to note. We're not here because we want HDS to fail, we're hear because we want HDS to be successful. That's why we provide constructive criticism.
Again, maybe we're at an inflection point, and HDS will need to reshape themselves from being a (literally) bullet proof light for serious users, to being a novely UI brand that offers fun configurations for collectors. If that happens, I may find myself as no longer part of their target market, and I can live with that. Their new emitter equipment might be a sign of them recognizing this, as they can increase the emitter options (a move that satisfies the collectors).
But, just the same, if that ends up happening, I'm perfectly content to keep relying on Malkoff's SST-20 stash for the next decade, haha.