I think clear HA color is harder to match when the coating is thicker (and therefore more durable). Draw the obvious conclusion.I continue to be amazed that only certain makers have issues attempting to match HA color between components.
I think clear HA color is harder to match when the coating is thicker (and therefore more durable). Draw the obvious conclusion.I continue to be amazed that only certain makers have issues attempting to match HA color between components.
lol Nascar, you just got "schooled". :hahaha: Even though I had no problems reading your charts. Constructive criticism I suppose... :shrug:Changing the background from grey to white will GREATLY improve the readability. As a former instructor, printing out charts with grey background (the default) instead of white earned a 5 point deduction in my grade book after the first week.
How to:
Right click center of chart in the grey area > format plot area > "Area" should be selected as "none" instead of "automatic"
The fact that the memory is erased by switching to low or high and then you have to reset your user defined level every time is a deal breaker for me. I will stick with my NDI which has a user defined mode that stays fixed where I want it, and a high I can switch to if I need it. Even though the PD Switching is a great improvement over the NDI's cheap clickie, what good is the PD if it switches off your user defined mode every time you access quick low or high. What makes this even worse is that switching to high or low can easily happen unintentionally, but then to be punished by losing your user defined setting? What could EdgeTac or 4 Sevens could been thinking about when they designed this into this light? In my opinion, they would have been better off without the instant low and high, if the cost for that was losing the user defined setting. It is hard to imagine a good reason if this was an intentional design plan. If anyone could give a good reason for this design, I would love to hear it.
What could EdgeTac or 4 Sevens could been thinking about when they designed this into this light? In my opinion, they would have been better off without the instant low and high, if the cost for that was losing the user defined setting. It is hard to imagine a good reason if this was an intentional design plan. If anyone could give a good reason for this design, I would love to hear it.
I also have an NDI, and I much prefer the EX10 to that. The interface is simpler with only one button to worry about, and I find myself using middle modes more (I'd use my NDI mostly as hi/lo). Plus, the EX10 is considerably cheaper, and the PD is quite a new feature.
Is it perfect for you? Obviously not, but people differ, and I recognize that.
Looks like the D10 performs a bit better than the EX10 when both using rechargable Lithium Ions cell - 14500 and RCR123 respectively.
This is very interesting for a rechargable cell.
The fact that the memory is erased by switching to low or high and then you have to reset your user defined level every time is a deal breaker for me. I will stick with my NDI which has a user defined mode that stays fixed where I want it, and a high I can switch to if I need it. Even though the PD Switching is a great improvement over the NDI's cheap clickie, what good is the PD if it switches off your user defined mode every time you access quick low or high. What makes this even worse is that switching to high or low can easily happen unintentionally, but then to be punished by losing your user defined setting? What could EdgeTac or 4 Sevens could been thinking about when they designed this into this light? In my opinion, they would have been better off without the instant low and high, if the cost for that was losing the user defined setting. It is hard to imagine a good reason if this was an intentional design plan. If anyone could give a good reason for this design, I would love to hear it.
Is this tone really called for? These discussions usually are more productive without this kind of arrogance.
Is it perfect for you? Obviously not, but people differ, and I recognize that.
My one suggestion is that it would be nice if the memory of the custom brightness you set was not erased when you went directly to high or low. I don't much like always having to adjust it.
will ultra fire or trustfire 14500s produce similar runtimes as AWs?
Question for you: When is it absolutely crucial to have instant access to medium?
And save to .png so you don't get the nasty lossy artifacts.Changing the background from grey to white will GREATLY improve the readability. As a former instructor, printing out charts with grey background (the default) instead of white earned a 5 point deduction in my grade book after the first week.
How to:
Right click center of chart in the grey area > format plot area > "Area" should be selected as "none" instead of "automatic"
I have a question for you: If there was no need that the user definable setting needed to be saved, why would you guess the EX10 was designed to save the level in the first place, only to lose it when low or high was activated?