4AA Luxeon ProPoly was my first "real" flashlight but...the Propolymax sounds like an inferior version of the Jetbeam PA40 (300 vs. 468 lumens, 2 modes vs. 4), and just inferior runtime given the lumens, unless they're using the alkaline runtimes.
The only advantage I can think of is some environmental-ratings were available for it (since it was at least ostensibly, aimed at firefighters).
What am I missing here? Just nostalgia, or some advantage this light has to make up for its huge shortcomings?
I disagree, I feel the same way about the Propolymax as I do with the Fenix e40 vs. PA40...I'd rather have either than the Jetbeam PA40. The PA40 at 468 lumens is 7300 candelas. It's too floody for my tastes at that output.
The e40 (xp-e) is 17,500cd at 220 lumens and the propolymax (is the emitter an xp-g2?) is 17,000cd at 300 lumens. I have a Maglite ML100 that has nearly 24,000 candelas at only 137 lumens and it is actually very useful outdoors and indoors, even though it is somewhat crude compared to more expensive Chinese lights. I love the throw and the fact that it takes 2 C cells, but it does end up being a more specialized light because of the tight beam. If I'm taking a walk at night I'll wear a Fenix MC11 set on low and carry along the Maglite if I want to light something up more.
Maybe someone else with experience with really bright, floody lights can chime in with their experience, but mine is that if I'm going to have a lot of lumens, I want them focused farther away. I feel like when I have a bright, floody light it just ends up reflecting back the extra lumens from things that are close by (the ground or vegetation) and making my night vision worse.
With small EDC lights, I don't mind floodier, weaker output.
If they put a larger reflector on a PA40 I'd be more interested. I love the efficiency and modes of that light.