Lucky Duck
Enlightened
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Messages
- 265
Sounds like you need to change your id to Sandblaster! :naughty:
Sounds like you need to change your id to Sandblaster! :naughty:
Look what he does for usI know how eager you guys have been to get these shots so I am glad to finally get something up to make you guys happy. It took me 3 1/2 hours to do the photo shoot and it was no fun. Turns out the sprinklers were set to come on while I was there and me and my equipment got wet. I was going to get even longer beamshots but the conditions just did not allow. I was freezing cold and the camera and lights all kept fogging up. It was so humid that wiping off the lens did no good as it would just fog right back up. Will have to get those shots later.
So as some may know I had issues with the batch of TN31 I bought. Quite a few were flickering and not able to output at full power. Since a great deal of what I am doing with these lights is making them more robust and durable I was non too happy to find this issue. In investigating the issue I found a change that was made from the first unit I bought and this last batch. In a less than stellar move ThruNite decided to coat the aluminum parts on the battery carrier and internal contact point on the head with something that is drastically increasing the circuit resistance. So much so that in some cases no electricity would pass. I figured it was probably anodizing but the normal chemical processes to remove it did not work. I tried some other chemicals I had but they really didn't work too well. So I decided that a mechanical removal of this layer would be necessary. So I went last week and purchased a sandblasting gun. I have tested to make sure it works but I am not doing the full batch until I get the blast cabinet as it makes a terrible mess. Harbor Freight did not have the blast cabinet in stock and said it should be on the next shipment arriving today. I will not be able to get over there until tomorrow but wanted to share this update with everyone. I took some before/after pictures to show the difference.
Here it is as I received it. Extremely poor with high resistance.
Here it is after I sandblast and surface it.
I have to do this to three parts on the light just to get proper electrical conduction. Just goes to show one of the benefits of purchasing my lights. You can trust proper QC will be done.
...I have to do this to three parts on the light just to get proper electrical conduction. Just goes to show one of the benefits of purchasing my lights. You can trust proper QC will be done.
Sounds like you need to change your id to Sandblaster! :naughty:
It looks dry? I was soaked and you can see sprinklers going in the modified shot's inset. The water everywhere may be affecting the view of the ground. In fact if you look back behind the trees you see what looks like concrete but which is in fact grass covered by water droplets which are retroreflecting.Look what he does for us
No offense but why do the beam shots look so retro and dead? Is it the camera or is every thing really dry there?
In your mods have you added solder or improved the connections of the springs for the batteries and battery carriers?
I wonder if my TN31 has the resistance stuff? The top and bottom of the battery carrier are yellow/goldish but not brunt Ti/multi colored like in your pics... or silver like in thrunite's picks.
I wonder if the TN31 was putting to much power to the LED so they did that to bring it down? I also wonder if that could be a quick easy mod/fix, just sand the battery carrier and waalaa? But without your thermal mods it might overheat the LED?
Thank youJust ordered my modified copy on your website saabluster, I think you're doing an awesome upgrade!!
It's not too bad.I'm trying to figure out how you would even hold the parts with the bulky gloves on while you blast them. Must be very tedious.
The testing roughly follows ANSI spec. I do not take readings until after 30 seconds so they are not exactly at "switch on". After 30 seconds I continue for approximately another 30 seconds to hunt around for the peak reading. There needs to be consistency in testing so changing a test to conform with an individual light's peculiarities is a slippery slope. Add to that that the time required to test the lights all at 3 minutes adds a significant amount of time to the process and that time needs to be accounted for with $. Longer testing means more cost. Since my figures need to be directly comparable (as much as possible) with other manufacturers, following the accepted guidelines and standards (ANSI) seems the prudent approach. I have also already printed out the forms I use for the certification and unless I find a flaw there I'd really rather not do that againSaabluster, I wanted to commend you not only on your amazing quality control, but also on your willingness to test each light and provide a certificate with corresponding lux figure. Thank you so much!
Can I ask you, though: On those certificates, is it possible to give us a lux figure on the TN31 at 3 minutes (instead of at switch on, for example)?
The reason I ask is because selfbuilt said in his review of the stock TN31 that the light has a drop-down, but stabilizes after 69 seconds and remains perfectly stabilized throughout the remaining run on maximum output (which is awesome :thumbsup So, I figured that the lux figure at 2 or 3 minutes would be indicative of what we would see in real life.
What do you think?
right on we need to think up a good name for the cpf king of throwsaabluster
It also raises your status in the CPF community to "Uber Master Level" for thrower lights.
You are definitely "Da Man" to see for a well made, high powered and long throwing flashlight.
nobody got theres yet ?
cant wait to see a few more beamshots...
ill be pulling the trigger soon....
hmm. That's strange.:thinking: Somehow this thread walked out of my forum.
Yeah my statement doesn't make much sense now that the thread is back here. Somehow one of the mods moved this thread into the LED flashlight forum. Clearly it has been moved back so all is well now.What do you mean by that Michael?
You have me at a loss!
Cheers