Surefire LFP 123A lithium-phosphate rechargeable batteries

snakyjake

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
668
Location
WA, USA
I purchased K2/Surefire because of Surefire's backing and K2's extensive testing. Most of all, K2's customer service has been extremely responsive of my concerns and providing me data.
 

sidecross

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
1,369
Tenergy LiFePO4 123A's claim "750mAh" and have minimum capacity 450mAh, but K2 Energy LFP123A's are 600mAh with minimum capacity 550mAh. Even if they do come from the same manufacturer, the cells aren't made to the same specifications.

I've never heard of K2 Energy before SureFire came out with the rechargeable kit, so I had looked into Tenergy LiFePO4 123A's. Based on the number of complaints about dead cells and reliability issues, I decided not to take the chance.

It is my understanding that the standard Surefire 123C is about 1300mAh while the Tenergy LiFePO4 is 750mAh.

I have just tried the Tenergy batteries and they have worked, but I would rather use the higher capacity Surefire's.
 

Robin24k

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
2,029
Location
Washington, USA
It is my understanding that the standard Surefire 123C is about 1300mAh while the Tenergy LiFePO4 is 750mAh.
With current technology, it's simply not possible for the 750mAh to be an accurate claim. Printing 750mAh on the batteries is pretty shady because according to the datasheet, they are only 450mAh...
 

sidecross

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
1,369
With current technology, it's simply not possible for the 750mAh to be an accurate claim. Printing 750mAh on the batteries is pretty shady because according to the datasheet, they are only 450mAh...

Thank you for the update on the claimed 750mAh information.
 

write2dgray

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
315
Location
Princeton, NJ
I've tested both companies cells for 5+ years. K2 is a reputable manufacturer. Tenergy rebrands different factories' cells for different product lines.
 

Viking

Enlightened
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
540
Location
Denmark
I saw a graph in another thread between K2 , Tenergy and AW's LFP batteries. Unfortunately I can't remember which thread :-(


But according to the graph, there were indeed more mah in the K2 cells , than the other two brands.
I think it was about 30 pct or so.


AW and tenergy was almost identical , with a very slight advantage for AW.


But remember also the K2 batteries costs twice as much as the tenergy's ( $ 6,- vs. $ 3,- each ).


I would recommend tenergy over K2. Because I don't think their performance justify the big price difference. unless little more mah is very important for some specific reasons.


The batteries cycle life was not part of the comparison however.
 
Last edited:

N8N

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
1,243
I looked up the datasheet for the K2 123A cell, and it says the max charging voltage cutoff of the cells is 4.2V not 3.6-3.7 as I would expect.

Has anyone tested the K2/Surefire charger and can you tell me at what voltage it terminates?

I'm seriously considering picking up a few of these cells in an attempt to get better UV performance out of my Streamlight Night Com UV relative to a single 17670, but I have this nasty habit of OCD style researching every purchase in an effort to get the highest quality/best value products.
 

Robin24k

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
2,029
Location
Washington, USA
From memory, I recall that the K2 charger cutoff at 3.65V. Lithium-phosphate can be charged to 4.2V, but it will reduce cell life.
 

N8N

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
1,243
Well, I just gave up and ordered... no local SF dealers have them to look at and I couldn't find a less expensive web source of the K2 cells, so I just ordered the kit off SF's web site. Will give my thoughts when I get them, although I don't really have a good method of checking capacity (no hobby charger at this time)
 

jkingrph

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
23
Why are CR123a rechargeable batteries not recommended for Surefire flashlights, on the LFP 232a types.?
 

snakyjake

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
668
Location
WA, USA
My guess:
Lithium cobalt is dangerous. There's a protection circuit that can be damaged. The protection circuit cuts off the light when voltage is low.

I've been using K2/Surefire LFP for a year now, and I get plenty of runtime. I also like that the light doesn't cutoff on me. And the chemistry is completely safe from overcharging/discharging.

In my real use, LFP's advantages are way more than what LCO gives. I won't compromise safety.
 

GoVegan

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
408
Location
Land of the rising sun
Did anyone else notice that SureFire stopped selling the K2 LFP 123A rechargeable batteries recently, they no longer appear in the "Parts and Accessories" links below each LED flashlight, in fact even the following URL no longer works:

http://www.surefire.com/2-pack-lfp123-rechargeable-batteries.html

My understanding was that they were popular, so does anyone have a definitive reason why, i.e. has anyone emailed Surefire?
 

thospress

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 17, 2011
Messages
46
Did anyone else notice that SureFire stopped selling the K2 LFP 123A rechargeable batteries recently, they no longer appear in the "Parts and Accessories" links below each LED flashlight, in fact even the following URL no longer works:

http://www.surefire.com/2-pack-lfp123-rechargeable-batteries.html

My understanding was that they were popular, so does anyone have a definitive reason why, i.e. has anyone emailed Surefire?

Surefire Customer Service advises that Surefire is looking for a different manufacturer, and that the replacement rechargeable batteries would be available on the website although unsure when. My guess is that inventory supplies were erratic.
 
Top