Yep, it's pretty common with many flashlights if you shake the hard enough from right to left. And, the pogo pins on newer ZL's tend to exaggerate it as they don't apply as much pressure as a traditional double spring design. It is necessary for manufacturers to bore the battery compartment fairly wide as well so that they can accommodate many different models and brands of cells. It's an easy fix though if it bothers you.I was right about the battery rattle! Not just mine.
thank youIt was just one magnet that I purchased CPF user Petrsv.
I recieved my SC600w Hi mk4 today and it's slightly less brighter then my SC600w Hi mk3. I measured 1074 lumens at max for the IV and 1196 lumens for the III. With 16113 Candela for the IV and 17896 Candela for my III @ 1 meter.
The IV cri is better then the III, but I'm a bit disappointed in the max output, I was hoping for the IV Hi to break the 300 meter beam distance barrier.
Curious if anyone else has both lights and can compare.
That's disappointing since ZL is usually pretty accurate about their output ratings. Did you try emailing them?
I decided to keep the light and not email them about it, sure it would be nice to have those extra 300 lumens on max but the light would just get hotter and ramp down faster.
It would seem ZL is listening. :thumbsup:
So, just to confirm, there is 5 pogo pins at the positive end as well? The MKIII's only had 3 so, using 5 should spread out the force and help prevent these lights from denting cells. Smart thinking ZL:thumbsup:.
Oh, so they must have made the upgrade mid production on the MKIII HI's. The original MKIII HI's had only 3 pins on the positive side.It depends which MK III. My SC600w Mk III Hi has 5 on the positive side and 4 on negative but the SC600Fd Mk III Plus has 5 on the positive side and 5 on negative as well.
Edit: Yes, I found a post about it. Looks like they made the change mid production due to the reports of dented cells. It's nice that ZL's are co Stanley refining their designs.Oh, so they must have made the upgrade mid production on the MKIII HI's. The original MKIII HI's had only 3 pins on the positive side.
If the problem is a less efficient emitter or driver then it may actually produce more heat compared to one running the proper 1400lm. If it is pulling the same current but producing less light then that extra energy has to be going somewhere.
I would definitely email ZL and ask for an exchange if I were you.
Yeah somethings not right with my IV. I sent them an email earlier today. Thanks for the suggestion.
Has anyone got the Plus version yet? I pre-ordered mine about 2 weeks ago. Haven't heard anything yet.
You hit the nail on the head Dan, I ended up testing my mk IV versus mk III with a laser temp gun after your suggestion. With freshly charged 30q cells to 4.2v and both lights at 77 degrees F cold start with Ambient temp 77 degrees F, after two minutes the head of the MK IV was at 111 degrees F and the head of the MK III at 96 degrees F. Yeah somethings not right with my IV. I sent them an email earlier today. Thanks for the suggestion.