I’d love to have a No AI option for watching YouTube videos.
Seeing is no longer believing, nor is hearing. I don't like it.
GET OFF MY LAWN!
Seeing is no longer believing, nor is hearing. I don't like it.
GET OFF MY LAWN!
If I have been consuming only leafy vegetables, fruits, and other such natural vegetation such that I have a balanced nutrition profile, would you mind terribly if I provided fertilizer for your flower bed?GET OFF MY LAWN!![]()
That's a hard yes. Yes, I would mind. The 12-gauge is loaded with rock salt. Don't make me Forrest Gump yer buttocks. Trust me when I advise you, there won't be any ice cream.If I have been consuming only leafy vegetables, fruits, and other such natural vegetation such that I have a balanced nutrition profile, would you mind terribly if I provided fertilizer for your flower bed?
a followup philosophical question...If the fertilizer had already been laid, would you go out of your way to remove it?That's a hard yes. Yes, I would mind. The 12-gauge is loaded with rock salt. Don't make me Forrest Gump yer buttocks. Trust me when I advise you, there won't be any ice cream.
Nevertheless, shouldn't people that inact change that produces positive results be given credit, regardless of the letter that represents their political party? Can we at least be that honest?So well said. Thank you.
We are so hyper-politicized right now that everything has to be blamed on one side or the other. Very sad really as we all aren’t that different except in our minds. Our minds are influenced by anything. It can lead us down a path that’s divisive and leads to the mess we are currently in.
I also agree that, most of the time, people who make these decisions are well intentioned. They are not evil or stupidity, they are attempting to improve an outcome. Sometimes it may not work. Attacking them is just our way of making ourselves seem smarter, which often isn’t the case.
Why? Is it a contest? Again, why can’t “we” improve things together?Nevertheless, shouldn't people that inact change that produces positive results be given credit, regardless of the letter that represents their political party? Can we at least be that honest?
Oh, gee. I don't know. /Why?
Yes.Is it a contest?
Because there are diametrically opposing views on how best to do so.Again, why can’t “we” improve things together?
We should get rid of political parties so we're back to voting for the individual. That will at least get more people to learn about what each candidate is about, instead of reflexively pulling the R or D lever.Nevertheless, shouldn't people that inact change that produces positive results be given credit, regardless of the letter that represents their political party? Can we at least be that honest?
We should get rid of political parties so we're back to voting for the individual. That will at least get more people to learn about what each candidate is about, instead of reflexively pulling the R or D lever.
I already answered that question. See post #327And why do we need to give credit at all? It's the job of our leaders to produce positive results. You don't need to get rewarded for doing your job beyond your paycheck. Too much self-aggrandizement among so-called leaders these days, starting with the guy on top.
You did and you didn't. Political parties are the reason we have diametrically opposed views in the first place, not the solution to that problem. Also, in order to solve a problem you first need to acknowledge that it exists. Both parties are guilty of not acknowledging certain problems.I already answered that question. See post #327
Yes. Political parties everywhere have removed nuance from conversations. Often even context.You did and you didn't. Political parties are the reason we have diametrically opposed views in the first place, not the solution to that problem. Also, in order to solve a problem you first need to acknowledge that it exists. Both parties are guilty of not acknowledging certain problems.
George Washington himself said that the two-party system would destroy America.You did and you didn't. Political parties are the reason we have diametrically opposed views in the first place, not the solution to that problem. Also, in order to solve a problem you first need to acknowledge that it exists. Both parties are guilty of not acknowledging certain problems.
I’m glad I don’t carry around such baggage.Oh, gee. I don't know. /Perhaps to inform people so they can vote for the politicians who are making changes they want to support.
Yes.
Because there are diametrically opposing views on how best to do so.
If the founding fathers could see our politics today I believe they would be sickened.George Washington himself said that the two-party system would destroy America.
He was in favor of getting rid of it.
I stand firmly by my opinion that everyone should have a hobby. Doesn't matter it is, so long as they enjoy it. And every hobby I can think of, once it gets serious enough, is expensive. Whether it's stamps, pieces of art, cars or flashlights.I have the luxury of having the income to spend way too much on this hobby. Many of my purchases are simply for the "cool" factor or many times out of nostalgia. I spend much more on older classic stuff as the excitement of hunting something down is just fun to me.