+1
I agree with you. :thumbsup:
+2
+1
I agree with you. :thumbsup:
Don't make tube long enough to accommodate varying length cells? Complain! Make tube wide enough to accommodate varying width cells? Complain! They can't win! Judging by SB's review, there's not much wrong with this thing.You shouldnt have to rewrap cells to make them work properly in a flashlight. I never have had to with any of the many flashlights I have used and owned. You are one of the lucky ones Mark. Many others have complained about connection issues, battery rattle, and crushed cells in lights with this design(even recently shipped ones). Even Nkon, one of the largest European ZL dealers, has a warning on these lights that they may not work with some cells including the one you listed that ZL sells. "This light needs batteries of 65mm long, it does not work with protected batteries (like from Keeppower, EagleTac or Enerpower) because these are too long. Unfortunately it also does not work with the Sanyo NCR18650GA, because it is a little bit too short. This causes the light to turn off when you shake the SC600w a little bit." That is cut and pasted from the HI model too(one of the newest releases). So some, although not all, still have issues. It wasnt just the initial batch. People can argue or tell themselves whatever they want in their head but, this design does have issues. It is no where near as reliable as a duel spring design with or without jumpers or a second inner spring. It also has the tightest cell tolerances I have ever seen on a flashlight in 25 years of being in this hobby(0.2mm tolerance). ZL could have used a design that wouldnt have caused these issues and would have even allowed for more cells, even protected cells of adequate continuous amp output, they just didnt. It was a bad decision imo and that 4mm reduction in length has come at a cost. It will be interesting to see what they do with new models going forward. I for one hope they change to either a more traditional design or a new one that is more forgiving and still maintains the many advantages of a traditional design.
I would call that "collateral damage' and would not be surprised if your comment and mine are deleted too.I was there and not involved, but my post about how much I like the MK III was also deleted.
Does anybody have any suggestions with what I can wrap the cell in to eliminate the rattling?
It would be the worst thing to do. Space isn't cold. There's nothing there in space, so nothing at minus 455 degrees to cool the torch down: No conductive cooling, no convection currents, it could only cool down through thermal radiation which would be pretty slow. The Zebra would be otherwise thermally insulated in space...Or you could have NASA send a Mk 3 to outer space where the temperature is minus 455 degrees Fahrenheit, but it still would not help in using the flashlight on the highest output in daily use.
Up to their old tricks being six weeks behind in orders. Very nice light though. Had mine since they first came out. I lost my SC11Thanks a lot for this review! I ordered one about three weeks ago after doing some reading and this thread helped me decide to pull the trigger on it. Hoping that they get them back in stock soon to fill the backlog of orders!
Sc32w does.Why doesn't Zebralight make flashlights that accept both protected cells and CR123.
I love their design, customizable UI and everything else, but this.
I just bought a SC62w so that I can use my protected cells. I can't use CR123 in either of them, anyway. :mecry: