ToolVn w DriverVn. It is LiIon ONLY, I believe (confirm this)
I can confirm that.
If I understand the technicalities correctly (not a expert), it is not possible to build LiIon overdischarge protection into a driver that is dual chemistry AAA because 1.5 volts is way below the safe discharge limit for LiIon.
It is neither logically nor technically impossible to design and manufacture such a driver. It is not impossible, however, development of such a smart driver would be far more expensive than an ordinary dumb driver, have more components, to necessarily detect what kind of cell chemistry it was using. How could it tell the difference between an AAA 1.5V and an already vastly overdischarged Li-ion (which becomes dangerous when you try to recharge it)?... that would be tricky. If a Li-ion is reading 1.5V it would look exactly like an AAA.
R&D could figure these things out. I would expect that voltage is not the only singular way to tell what kind of chemistry a cell is, though it is one way. NiMH, Alkaline, LiFeS2, LiFePO4, LiCo, LiMn all likely have other characteristics that could be detected with a smart driver, such as specific characteristics of current drain. Once a second characteristic is identified, when added to the known voltage, the smart driver would be able to accurately identify any cell and apply a stored profile for that kind of cell such that low voltage protection could be implemented for any cell chemistry. It absolutely is not impossible.
Though there are no physical laws of nature preventing such a driver from existing, it is the market and the low expectation of the masses of customers, and their unwillingness to pay more for such a smart driver that prevents it from being developed. I mean... someone like Steve Wozniak, or any competant engineer, could design it with enough time and capital. Designing it is almost academic. But you'd need an Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos to push something like that through development to market, where it would probably fail spectacularly to be profitable.
Edit: Ok, Apple, Inc. has the resources to solve the engineering problems, and the razmataz and hucksterability to make the idea trendy enough to interest enough of their customers into paying a ridiculous premium for such a device. Shop the idea at Apple, they could sell sand in the Sahara and make it absurdly profitable.