Raysbeam
Enlightened
More 18650 offerings please. Not lumen monsters yet some good edc size with great runtimes.
More 18650 offerings please. Not lumen monsters yet some good edc size with great runtimes.
Actually, they do. The pumps are supposed to be checked now and then to make sure they're not "too far" off. There's supposed to be an inspection sticker on them.Even white paper can change the reflected intensity of the various wavelengths. Also, what is an estimated lumen??? Last time I checked they were not selling estimated gallons of gas at the local service station.
More 18650 offerings please. Not lumen monsters yet some good edc size with great runtimes.
I just ordered a Keeppower 16650 for my QT2-L. It's rated at 2500mah (300mah more than my older AW 18650's), so it should give great runtime.
18650 can still give 30% more power than the 16650.well i guess they're too busy putting out new Olight models (david chow is chairman of Olight)
but to reinvigorate the Quark line they have to come up with a fresh magnetic control ring design. perhaps taking advantage of that dead space around the base of the reflector. then make the threads compatible w/ the large installed base of quark bodies
probably a bad idea to put a side button on a quark
18650 really isnt necessary since the KeepPower 16650 2500mah is available and offers ample runtime at 780 lumens
If I wanted something Quark-like with a side switch, I'd get a Fenix. I preferred the PD series before that happened. It's overcomplicating things. Head tight, high and strobe. Head loose start at low then up from there. I see no need for an auxilary button where you have to roll the light around in your hand to find it. IMHO, head tight/head loose is better in the dark. You can set it up before activation.probably a bad idea to put a side button on a quark
18650 can still give 30% more power than the 16650.
What's the good 26650 these days? I keep finding junk with only 3000-3500 mah. I see Ultrafires claiming 5000 mah, but yeah... RIGHT. (sigh, ultrafire.)why stop at 18650. why not 26650? both would break compatibility w/ existing quark bodies
If I wanted something Quark-like with a side switch, I'd get a Fenix. I preferred the PD series before that happened. It's overcomplicating things. Head tight, high and strobe. Head loose start at low then up from there. I see no need for an auxilary button where you have to roll the light around in your hand to find it. IMHO, head tight/head loose is better in the dark. You can set it up before activation.
Okay, that's it. It's high time I patented electricity.too bad companies like surefire and apple have patented too much "stuff". apparently SF has patents on the physical properties of aluminum oxide (insulator) that no one else could have it on their tailcap threads
i'm actually surprised apple hasn't registered the cylindrical flashlight form like they did w/ the rectangular tablet shape
Okay, that's it. It's high time I patented electricity.
So SF has patented resistors. Why not? I need to patent capactors and inductors as well. That'll kill off some innovation!
Next I'll patent the internet and breathing. I'll be rich!
well i guess they're too busy putting out new Olight models (david chow is chairman of Olight)